I have hair loss for quite some time (maybe more than a year). At the beginning did not paying attention, I thought it was something temporary, but gradually began to notice that my hair is progressively diluted. Case of diffuse thinning, it is too dry and horrible shaggy edge.
I stopped her tether, I began to try different anti-hair loss - shampoos Defluval, mask urine even ampules of Rene Furterer, toppings with Ivy water a month and drink something Revalid, this week I took Kalmatsin and now use a shampoo Ducrot Anafaza and sprays Hronostim ... Nothing helps!
Poobikolih and few physicians. Two dermatologists who said they have no problem on the scalp, nor are they damaged my hair follicles. I reviewed my teeth - everything is fine. Had ultrasound of the abdomen - also all in October. Run your tests - thyroid is fine, all her hormones are the norm, including TAT and MAT are not overstated.
Only slightly suspicious things are the blood, where the values indicate a position close to anemia - hemoglobin, erythrocytes, etc. are just the lowest limit, without going into it though. My doctor said it is still anemic, although they will consult and elsewhere. My iron is absolutely the norm, but with the proviso that during studies I accepted a horse dose Revalid, which has iron, so I do not know whether it was a real indicator.
When I tested sex hormones testosterone and estradiol. Are the norm, although testosterone tends slightly toward the ceiling, and estradiol - more at the bottom. Here:
testosterone: 1.58 (0.17 to 2.15 for women)
estradiol: 253 (143-694 in the phase of the cycle)
After two weeks I decided to once again put these studies in another laboratory and to consult a specialist.
At this stage, however, want to ask you exactly how to determine whether hair loss is androgenic?? Especially women here who know that they have androgenic alopecia - how you understand that it is for this? As indicators of sex hormones or any other signs. And yet - in fact, what doctor should be consulted?
I think it is important to understand the type of hair loss in order to orient and how to heal. Needless to say, I am appalled at the moment until I see how the state of my hair is getting worse and worse, whatever you do. Now I am ashamed to walk the streets. Would tell me that my hair looks rather low, it was not visible that fell, but I constantly monitor the reactions of people who recently have seen me with a nice double-thick hair and I think they look at me with some Sorry. Disgusting! I know that you create even more stress, but nothing to do mga ...
In androgenic alopecia is miniaturization of the follicles, which can be identified in scalp biopsy - a small part of the scalp (no more than 4 mm in diameter) is withdrawn from 1-2 locations to examine the condition of the hair follicles there. Do not know if it is practiced in Bulgaria and where it might be interesting to examine. This is a pretty painful procedure and then the place to heal - taken follicles were also lost. And again, opinions are mixed whether it can be diagnosed on the basis of follicles taken and whether it is worth such an intervention. There are other methodologies as trihograma. In this method at various places on the scalp are removed and about 50-100 hairs under a microscope to determine in what phase of growth were. The ratio between the growing (anagen phase) to the last phase before the fall (telogen) ideal is 90% to 10% for healthy hair, over 35% telogen hair in a vase is already an indication of hair loss. Only that this ratio does not show whether the androgenic alopecia or telogen temporary efluvium (typical postpartum example). Looks are also the diameter of the hair - the presence of hair with a significantly smaller diameter than the other may be an indication of minityuarizirane which occurs in androgenic alopecia.
After many doctors that I visited in the last 7 years and everything I am reading the I have not come to an accurate diagnosis. Once I made a Raspberry trihograma clinic and Dr. Malchevski claimed that 80% of my hairs are in growth. I'm not very inclined to believe these results because it offers a very expensive procedure of injection of minoxidil into the scalp, arguing that it gives very good results if at least 80% of your hairs are in growth. If I do not give any results, even my hair quite na after the injections and the expected growth did not occur.
In women it is very difficult to put a diagnosis of androgenic alopecia in young age before menopause. Therefore, look for numerous reasons as you have done. I read that you can have a genetic predisposition and it is otlyuchi than other hormonal problems. Things are obviously complex and can hardly be isolated one reason on which to focus. Given that women with similar hormonal variations (caused by malfunctioning zhitovidna gland, ovaries, etc.) hair reacts differently (some have hair and not others) probably inherited sensitivity of follicles to dehidrotestosteron is another factor. Maybe in a perfect balance of female hormones, thyroid, stocks of ferritin in the body and so on. This sensitivity may not occur for at least until menopause female hormones protect against hair loss. But when the process is unlocked unfortunately becomes complicated. There are all sorts of preparations, but from my experience so far the treatment of doctors is based on trial and error - rather than an individual is what will affect the process.
Must researches and level of dehidrotestosteron (DHEA-s) in your body. But even in the rules is not excluded that the follicles are you just super sensitive to this hormone, which attacks and gradual miniaturization. This occurs in men only in their hair loss is usually not diffuse, but clearly some places. In women with androgenic alopecia minoxidil is usually prescribed for spreading anti-androgen contraceptive with ingredients (like Diane 35 or Yasmin) and separately as aldakton antiandrogenic drug (spironolactone). I'm Diane were taken 35 and maybe there was some improvement, but I can not say for sure because I do not measure density of hair before and after 2-year intake. It is good to monitor these things when they use different drugs, but no doctor has ever used such a method to monitor the effectiveness of treatment. Yavmo themselves need to do to them as much care in general - they do not give guarantees, in many cases, dermatologists are even completely ignorant on the issues of hair.
No comments:
Post a Comment